본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 1

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 4

INTRODUCTION 5

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6

KEY FINDINGS 7

1. APPROACH 8

2. UNDERSTANDING PEOPLE 12

3. EMISSIONS PATHWAYS 22

4. POLICY FRAMEWORK 25

Figures 7

FIGURE 1. THE FAIRER PATHWAY REDUCES EMISSIONS AT THE FASTEST PACE 7

FIGURE 2.1. TRANSPORT COSTS FALL FOR ALL BUT CAR-FREE HOUSEHOLDS 13

FIGURE 2.2. THE MOST AFFLUENT EMIT FAR MORE FROM DOMESTIC TRANSPORT THAN THOSE ON THE LOWEST INCOME 14

FIGURE 2.3. THE FAIRER PATHWAY ASKS THOSE WITH THE MOST RESOURCES TO MAKE STEEPER EMISSION REDUCTIONS 15

FIGURE 2.4. EVEN UNDER A FAIRER PATHWAY AN EMISSIONS GAP REMAINS BETWEEN THE MOST AND LEAST AFFLUENT 16

FIGURE 2.5. ONLY THE FAIRER PATHWAY SEES THE MOST AFFLUENT GROUP CUT THEIR EMISSIONS AT A FASTER RATE THAN THOSE ON THE LOWEST INCOMES 17

FIGURE 2.6. THE DOMESTIC EMISSIONS GAP WILL BE GREATER IN 2035 THAN 2024 UNLESS EXPLICIT ACTION IS TAKEN TO ADDRESS IT 18

FIGURE 2.7. A FAIRER PATHWAY WOULD SEE THE MOBILITY OF THOSE ON THE LOWEST INCOMES RISE BY 10 PER CENT BY 2035 19

FIGURE 2.8. A FAIRER PATHWAY REQUIRES A COMBINATION OF DEMAND REDUCTION AND MORE TRAVEL BY SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT MODES 20

FIGURE 2.9. TRAFFIC CONTINUES TO RISE UNDER ALL BUT THE FAIRER PATHWAY 21

FIGURE 3.1. PACE OF EMISSION REDUCTIONS VARIES ACROSS THE THREE SCENARIOS 23

FIGURE 3.2. FAIRER IS FASTER ON THE PATH TO REDUCING EMISSIONS FROM DOMESTIC TRANSPORT 24