본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 1

Abstract 3

1. Introduction 5

2. Theory and hypotheses 6

3. Data and measurement 9

3.1. Our survey 9

3.2. Daily recovery experiences 9

3.3. Nomikai 9

3.4. Dependent variables 9

3.5. Controls 10

3.6. Comparing DRE for Japanese and French small business owners 10

4. Analyses and results 12

4.1. Validation of DRE questionnaire among Japanese business owners 12

4.2. DRE and mental health: Linear regressions (OLS) 13

4.3. DRE and mental health: SEM analysis 16

4.4. Summary of OLS and SEM results 16

5. Discussion 18

6. Conclusion 23

References 24

Tables 11

Table 1. Means, standard deviations, and minimum/maximum values for overall DRE, DRE dimensions. nomikaL dependent variables, and control variables 11

Table 2. Pearson correlations overall DRE, DRE dimensions, nomikai, and dependent variables 12

Table 3. Rotated factor loadings resulting from exploratory factor analysis (promax rotation) 13

Table 4. OLS regressions with well-being, job satisfaction, burnout, and stress as dependent variables; overall DRE and nomikai are the independent variables 14

Table 5. OLS regressions with well-being, job satisfaction, burnout, and stress as dependent variables; DRE dimensions and nomikai are the independent variables 15

Table 6/Table 5. Overview of some studies reporting values of overall DRE and its four dimensions of the Recovery Experience Questionnaire (REQ) 19

Figures 17

Figure 1. Standardized coefficients resulting from SEM analysis with DRE as a second-order construct 17

Figure 2. Standardized coefficients resulting from SEM analysis with direct paths from DRE dimensions to mental health 18