본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 5

Executive summary 6

1. Why does O&M matter for residential RTS ecosystem? 11

1.1. India's strategy for meeting rising electricity demand sustainably 12

1.2. Irregular maintenance can significantly affect the performance and durability of RTS systems 12

1.3. Scope and approach of this report 13

2. Structural gaps and operational realities in residential RTS 13

2.1. How maintenance services are currently delivered 14

2.2. Why maintenance remains peripheral in residential RTS ecosystem 14

3. The economic impacts of irregular maintenance 15

3.1. From policy to outcomes: Understanding the RTS ecosystem and its stakeholders 16

3.2. Framework for scenario-based performance assessment 17

4. How irregular maintenance affects consumer returns 18

4.1. Metrics to evaluate the implications for consumers 18

4.2. Irregular maintenance can reduce lifetime savings from a RTS system up to 100% 19

5. How irregular maintenance erodes economic benefits for discoms 21

5.1. Framework for assessing economic implications 22

5.2. Poor maintenance of the RTS reduces the economic benefits 23

6. How irregular maintenance undermines subsidy effectiveness and net-zero ambitions 24

6.1. Erosion of subsidy effectiveness 25

6.2. Understanding the grid-rebound effect in the context of retail tariff subsidies 26

6.3. Emissions reduction outcomes 28

7. What is the market opportunity for residential RTS maintenance services? 29

7.1. Cleaning services alone represent a multi-billion annual market 29

7.2. Bundled maintenance services expand the revenue pool significantly 30

7.3. The actual realisation depends on consumer uptake 31

8. Business models to scale residential RTS maintenance services 33

8.1. Platform-led marketplace model driven by private aggregation 33

8.2. Pay-per-use service model anchored in oversight by discoms or state nodal agencies 35

9. Recommendations and the way forward 37

Annexures 39

Acronyms 43

References 44

Tables 17

Table 1. Comparative CUF-based performance benchmarks for RTS systems 17

Table 2. From lifetime savings to return on investment: Factors driving household adoption of RTS 19

Table 3. List of parameters considered to evaluate costs and benefits for discoms 22

Table 4. RTS underperformance can erode the net financial benefit for discoms by up to 80% 23

Table 5. RTS underperformance has a grave impact on subsidy efficiency, emissions & more 25

Table 6. Strategic roadmap for strengthening system performance in India's residential RTS ecosystem 38

Figures 16

Figure 1. Roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders across the RTS ecosystem 16

Figure 2. Economic and system-level consequences of rooftop solar underperformance 18

Figure 3. A well-maintained RTS system can outperform fixed deposit returns 20

Figure 4. RTS underperformance could inflate subsidy expenditure by up to INR 624 billion 26

Figure 5. Poor system upkeep could erode subsidy effectiveness by up to INR 380 million annually 28

Figure 6. Up to 80% of potential CO₂ reductions at stake due to irregular maintenance 29

Figure 7. More than 70% of the market opportunity for bundled maintenance services is concentrated in five states/UTs 30

Figure 8. Even a 20% uptake could create a multi-billion market opportunity 31

Figure 9. Ensuring reliable performance through best practices 32

Figure 10. A digital marketplace for RTS maintenance 34

Figure 11. A public-intermediated pay-per-use model for RTS maintenance 36

Boxes 21

Box 1. RTS as a long-term household investment 21

Box 2. Basic dos and don'ts to ensure long-term performance of RTS systems 32

Box 3. Building the skilled workforce for RTS maintenance 37

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기