본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 3

Highlights 2

Letter 5

Expedited Award and Construction Schedule Negatively Affected Planning and Acquisition of Camp East Montana 11

Expedited Award and Construction Schedule Drove Acquisition Decision-Making 11

Army and ICE's Planning Did Not Incorporate Contract Flexibilities to Avoid Waste 15

ICE Provided Inconsistent Oversight to Address Significant Performance Issues 18

Camp East Montana Opened Without Meeting Key Detention Standards and ICE Did Not Conduct Required Inspection 18

Significant and Ongoing Performance and Oversight Challenges Warrant Assessment of Lessons Learned 21

Conclusions 24

Recommendations for Executive Action 25

Agency Comments, Third Party Views, and Our Evaluation 25

Appendix I. Comments from the Department of Homeland Security 29

Appendix II. Comments from the Department of Defense 33

Tables 3

Table 1. Observed Gaps between Requirements and Contractor Performance When U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE)... 19

Table 2. Discrepancy and Oversight Reports Issued by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to the Camp East Montana Contractor,... 21

Figures 3

Figure 1. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Camp East Montana in El Paso, Texas 7

Figure 2. Acquisition Timeline for U.S Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) Camp East Montana 12