권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 6
Abstract / Résumé 5
Introduction and main findings 8
1. Structural features and limitations of Hungary's flat personal income tax (PIT) system 10
1.1. Work incentives are relatively low at the bottom of the income distribution 11
1.2. The redistributive impact of the PIT system has declined 13
1.3. PIT revenues are low, only weakly related to economic activity and projected to decline due to ageing 15
2. Towards a more progressive PIT schedule 18
2.1. PIT on labour income 18
2.2. PIT on capital income 20
3. Quantifying the impact on PIT revenues 22
3.1. Static impact of the PIT reform (Scenario 1) 22
3.2. Behavioural responses on PIT and SSC revenues 23
3.3. Impact of the PIT reform (Scenario 1) on other tax revenues 27
3.4. Impact of the PIT reform (Scenario 1) on tax buoyancy 28
3.5. Impact of the PIT reform (Scenario 1) on capital income taxation 29
3.6. Total impact of the PIT reform (Scenario 1) on tax revenues 31
3.7. Total impact of the PIT reform (Scenarios 2 and 3) on tax revenues 32
4. Impact of the PIT reform on potential GDP 34
5. Impact on income inequality 36
6. Political feasibility and optimal tax rates 38
6.1. Political feasibility 38
6.2. Distance to optimal tax rates 38
Conclusion 40
References 42
Annexe A. Quantifying the impact of a PIT reform on tax revenue, accounting for behavioural responses along the intensive margin 48
Annexe B. Heterogeneity in labour supply elasticities 51
Annexe C. Political feasibility and sufficient statistics for optimal tax rates 52
Figure 1. The tax wedge for low-income workers is relatively high for singles 12
Figure 2. The tax wedge for low-income workers is relatively high for couples 12
Figure 3. The average income tax rate for low-income earners is one of the highest in the OECD, while the top marginal tax rate is one of the lowest 13
Figure 4. The redistributive impact of the Hungarian tax system is relatively low 14
Figure 5. Tax progressivity is the lowest among OECD countries 15
Figure 6. PIT revenue decreased due to tax reforms 16
Figure 7. The effective average tax rate gap between pensioners and workers is large 17
Figure 8. Population ageing will weigh on the tax-to-GDP ratio 17
Figure 9. Effective marginal and average tax rates on labour income for different PIT schedules 19
Figure 10. Top marginal income tax rates would remain relatively low in all scenarios 20
Figure 11. Labour income is taxed at a higher rate than capital income in Hungary 21
Figure 12. Most Hungarian taxpayers would gain from the PIT reform (Scenario 1) 22
Figure 13. The saving rate is particularly low for low-income households in Hungary 27
Figure 14. The PIT reform will support potential GDP 34
Boxes 7
Box 1. Quantifying the impact of a capital income tax reform, accounting for behavioural responses 30
Box 2. Potential GDP and the OECD long term model 35
Box 3. Quantifying the impact of the PIT reform on inequality 37
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.