본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 3

Abstract 1

Introduction 5

Methodology 9

Scope and limitations 12

Results by case: How do agencies understand their effectiveness today? 13

AFD 13

KOICA 18

Norad 22

New Zealand's MFAT 26

Results across dimensions 30

Flexibility and adaptability 30

Allocation 32

Cost-effectiveness 34

Organizational design 37

Implementation of global effectiveness norms and principles 39

Key takeaway: While the effectiveness dimensions are interdependent and can be mutually reinforcing, strategic tensions make it difficult... 41

Implications for the future of effective practice 43

Conclusion 46

Bibliography 48

Tables 4

TABLE 1. Case selection summary 10

TABLE 2. Percentage of AFD interviews mentioning each effectiveness dimension 14

TABLE 3. Percentage of KOICA interviews mentioning each effectiveness dimension 19

TABLE 4. Percentage of Norad interviews mentioning each effectiveness dimension 23

TABLE 5. Percentage of MFAT interviews mentioning each effectiveness dimension 27

TABLE 6. Strength of resonance of each dimension by agency 30

Figures 4

FIGURE 1. Timeline of major understandings of agency effectiveness since the early 2000s 9

FIGURE 2. Familiarity with the Busan principles 40

Boxes 4

BOX 1. Case selection approach 10