권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 5
Abstract/Résumé 4
1. Introduction 7
2. Non-compete clauses and productivity 9
3. Data 10
3.1. Non-compete survey data 11
3.2. Firm-level data 14
3.3. Additional data sources 14
4. Empirical methodology 15
4.1. Channel #1: Productivity-enhancing labour reallocation 15
4.2. Channel #2: Knowledge diffusion 16
5. Empirical results 17
5.1. Baseline results 17
5.1.1. Non-disclosure and no-poaching agreements 20
5.1.2. Additional robustness tests 21
5.2. Non-compete regulation 22
6. Aggregate productivity implications 25
7. Concluding remarks and policy discussion 29
References 31
Annex A. Data 35
Annex B. Additional results from empirical analysis 41
Figure 1. Workers report meaningful effects on job mobility and business entry 13
Figure 2. Non-compete clauses are associated with weaker productivity-enhancing labour reallocation 19
Figure 3. The negative associations between non-compete clauses, reallocation and catch-up growth are more pronounced in countries... 24
Figure 4. Aggregate productivity effects of non-compete clauses 28
Boxes 6
Box 1. Non-compete clauses and business entry 12
Box 2. Computation of aggregate productivity effects 26
Figure A.1. The OECD index of non-compete regulation 40
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.