본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 1

Abstract 2

1. Introduction 4

2. The Business Plan Competition 8

2.1. MbeleNaBiz 8

2.2. Streamlined Selection Process 10

2.3. Multi-Stage Selection Process 10

2.4. Grant Size Experiment 12

2.5. Implementation 12

2.6. Verification of Randomization and Comparison of Firms Selected in Streamlined versus Multi-Stage Process 12

3. Measuring Impacts 14

3.1. Data Collection 14

3.2. Estimation of Treatment Impacts 15

3.3. Dealing with Survey Attrition 16

4. Impacts on Firm Operation, Employment, and Firm Performance 17

4.1. What does theory predict we should see? 17

4.2. Empirical Impacts 20

4.2.1. Impacts on Jobs 20

4.2.2. Impacts on Firm Performance 22

4.2.3. Robustness of Main Results to Attrition 23

4.3. Heterogeneity in Treatment Impacts 24

4.4. Job Creation and Cost Effectiveness 26

5. Why Do We See These Impacts? 26

5.1. Did the way the grant was spent and invested differ across groups? 26

5.2. Do observable characteristics explain the differences in 9K grant impacts? 30

6. Conclusion 32

7. References 33

Appendices 49

A. Timeline 49

B. Business Plan Training 56

C. Robustness to Attrition 57

D. Measurement of Key Outcomes 60

E. Impacts on Secondary Firm Performance Outcomes 64

F. Additional Tables and Figures on Mechanisms 67

Tables 37

Table 1. Balance at Baseline 37

Table 2. Impacts on Firm Operation and Employment 38

Table 3. Impacts on Firm Performance 39

Table 4. Robustness Checks for 3 Year Follow-up 40

Table 5. Heterogeneity by Gender 41

Table 6. Heterogeneity by Business Ownership at Intake 42

Table 7. Impact of Grant Use on Capital and Finance 43

Table 8. Impact of Grant on Business Organization and Innovation 44

Table 9. Reweighting the Streamlined Sample to Look More Similar to the Multi-Stage Sample on Gender, New Vs Existing, and Application Score 45

Figures 46

Figure 1. Impact Evaluation Process 46

Figure 2. Quantile Treatment Effects (3-year follow-up survey) 47

Figure 3. Grant Expenditure by Treatment Group (원문불량) 48

Appendix Tables 49

Table A1. Comparison of Winners in Both Processes to the Other Applicants 49

Table A2. Secondary employment outcomes 50

Table A3. 1 and 2 Year Follow-up Survey Highest Paid Workers Characteristics 52

Table A4. Innovation and Training Index Components 53

Table A5. Heterogeneity by City 55

Table A6. Heterogeneity by Education 56

Table B1. Impact of Business Plan Training 57

Table C1. Survey Response Rates by Follow-up 58

Table C2. Balance Table among Respondents to the 3 Year Follow-up Survey at Baseline 59

Table E1. Intensive Margin - Impacts on Firm Performance 65

Table E2. Additional Impacts on Total Income and on Firm Performance 66

Table F1. Heterogeneity in Impacts of 9k-Stream for those with Above vs Below Median Application Scores 67

Table F2. Heterogeneity in Impacts for the Multi-stage Top 750 by Judges' scores 68

Table F3. Baseline Correlates of Judges' Score in the Multi-stage Sample 69

Appendix Figures 67

Figure F1. Correlation Application Score vs Multi-stage judge Score 67

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기