권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 3
Highlights 2
Letter 5
Background 8
EM Mission, Structure, and Cleanup Sites 8
DOE Membership in International Organizations 9
Nuclear Waste Cleanup Efforts in Selected Countries 10
Several Countries Have Taken Actions That Accelerated Cleanup, Reduced Risks, and Resulted in Cost Savings 14
Two Countries Shifted Their Approaches to Focus on Directing Limited Resources to the Highest Risks 14
Four Countries Use Comprehensive National Inventories to Inform Nuclear Waste Management Efforts 24
Full-Scale Test Facilities Helped France and the UK Save Money and Minimize Disruptions to Their Cleanup Efforts 28
EM Is Missing Opportunities to Potentially Reduce Risks and Costs and Accelerate Cleanup 31
EM Uses Limited Formal and Informal Mechanisms to Engage with Some Countries 31
We and Others Have Highlighted Challenges EM Faces with Its Cleanup Mission That Other Countries Also Face 35
EM Is Missing Opportunities to Identify Potential Alternative Ways to Reduce Risks and Costs and Accelerate Cleanup 38
Conclusions 42
Recommendation for Executive Action 43
Agency Comments 43
Appendix I: Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 46
Appendix II: Comments from the Department of Energy 50
Appendix III: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments 52
Figure 1. Summary of the United Kingdom Nuclear Decommissioning Authority's (NDA) Approach to the Prioritization of Risk 15
Figure 2. The United Kingdom's (UK) Waste Hierarchy Used for the Management of Nuclear Waste 17
Figure 3. Nuclear Waste Being Transported through a Community in the United Kingdom (UK) for Recycling Instead of Disposal 18
Figure 4. Full-Scale In-Canister Test Facility at France's Marcoule Site 29
Figure 5. United Kingdom National Nuclear Laboratory's Vitrification Test Facility 30
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.