권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
표제지
목차
ABSTRACT 7
I. 서론 18
1. 연구의 배경 18
2. 기존의 연구 20
3. 연구의 목적 22
4. 연구의 구성 24
II. 유체-입자 양방향수치해석기법 26
1. 머리말 26
2. 유체해석을 위한 파동장모델 27
1) 기초방정식 27
2) 격자구성 및 Cell에서 변수위치의 결정 30
3) 기초방정식의 이산화(Discretization) 32
4) SOLA scheme 34
5) 자유수면의 모의(VOF method) 37
6) 경계조건 51
7) 안정조건 62
3. 개별요소법(DEM) 64
1) 개별요소법의 개요 64
2) 접촉판정과 접촉상대변위증분 64
3) 입자간 작용력 66
4) 운동방정식 68
5) 개별요소법(DEM) 계수 설정 71
4. 파동장모델과 개별요소법의 양방향해석기법 77
1) 양방향해석기법의 개요 77
2) 양방향해석기법의 흐름도 77
5. 맺음말 79
III. 유체-입자 양방향 연성수치모델의 검증 80
1. 머리말 80
2. 파동장모델의 검증 80
1) 파동장모델의 검증을 위한 조건 80
2) 파랑-구조물 상호작용에 따른 파고/유속변화 검증 82
3) 파랑-호안 상호작용에 따른 파고/간극수압변화 검증 85
3. 개별요소법의 검증 88
1) 개별요소법의 검증을 위한 조건 88
2) 안식각 검증 89
4. 조시화기법의 검증 91
1) 이동량 검증 91
2) 조시화기법을 이용한 이동량 검증 98
5. 맺음말 100
IV. 해중 식생대공법의 개발 및 특성 분석 102
1. 머리말 102
2. 해중 식생대의 개요 102
3. 수리모형실험 104
1) 실험방법 104
2) 실험조건 107
4. 수치파동수조 108
1) 수치파동수조의 개요 108
2) 수치파동수조의 타당성 110
5. 해중 식생대 주변의 수리특성 111
1) 파랑제어특성 111
2) 흐름제어특성 134
6. 해중 식생대 설치에 따른 연안역 초기이동특성 139
1) 수치모형실험의 개요 139
2) 해중 식생대의 파랑 및 흐름제어특성에 따른 초기표사이동 140
7. 맺음말 149
V. 인공산호초공법의 개발 및 특성 분석 150
1. 머리말 150
2. 인공산호초의 개요 150
3. 수리모형실험 152
1) 실험방법 152
2) 실험조건 153
4. 수치파동수조 154
1) 수치파동수조의 개요 154
2) 수치파동수조의 타당성 155
5. 인공산호초 주변의 수리특성 157
1) 파랑제어특성 157
2) 흐름제어특성 168
6. 인공산호초 설치에 따른 연안역 초기이동특성 171
1) 수치모형실험의 개요 171
2) 인공산호초의 파랑 및 흐름제어특성에 따른 초기표사이동 172
7. 맺음말 180
VI. 결론 및 고찰 182
1. 유체-입자 양방향수치해석기법의 타당성 183
2. 해중 식생대의 파랑 및 흐름제어특성 184
3. 해중 식생대에 따른 초기표사이동의 저감특성 185
4. 인공산호초의 파랑 및 흐름제어특성 185
5. 인공산호초에 따른 초기표사이동의 저감특성 186
참고문헌 188
Fig. 1. Definition of porosity components in porous body element 28
Fig. 2. Location of variables for a staggered mesh 31
Fig. 3. Newton-Raphson method 35
Fig. 4. Modeling of free surface 40
Fig. 5. Exception to the classification of cells 41
Fig. 6. Evaluation of free surface shape 43
Fig. 7. Definition of Donor-cell and Acceptor-cell 45
Fig. 8. Fluid density of boundary cell for Donor-Acceptor method 46
Fig. 9. Change of subscript in the boundary cell 47
Fig. 10. Advection method of VOF function 48
Fig. 11. Exception of advection computation 49
Fig. 12. Velocity boundary condition 52
Fig. 13. Pressure boundary condition on free surface 53
Fig. 14. Sketch of added fictitious dissipation zone 54
Fig. 15. Virtual velocity components in case of the mesh with inclined... 57
Fig. 16. Estimation of surface permeability in case of the mesh with inclined... 58
Fig. 17. Gradual increasing of wave source 61
Fig. 18. Coordinates of two dimensioal elements 65
Fig. 19. Spring-dashpot-slider system 67
Fig. 20. Contact of spring element 73
Fig. 21. Section method of judging for contac 76
Fig. 22. Flowchart of two-way analysis method between NWT and DEM 78
Fig. 23. Definition sketch of numerical wave tank based on the... 81
Fig. 24. Definition sketch of numerical wave tank based on the... 82
Fig. 25. Comparison between the measured (Nadaoka et al., 1994) and the... 83
Fig. 26. Comparison between the measured (Nadaoka et al., 1994) and the... 84
Fig. 27. Comparison between the measured (Nadaoka et al., 1994) and the... 85
Fig. 28. Comparison between the measured (Nakamura, 2008) and the... 86
Fig. 29. Comparison between the measured (Nakamura, 2008) and the... 87
Fig. 30. Definition sketch of numerical tank based on the experiment by... 88
Fig. 31. Spatial distribution of behavior due to the Alumina and Quartz sand 90
Fig. 32. Comparison between the measured (Yamada et al., 2010) and the... 91
Fig. 33. Definition sketch of numerical wave tank based on the experiment... 92
Fig. 34. Spatial distribution of bore-induced open the gate(CASE1,... 94
Fig. 35. Comparison between the measured(Othman et al., 2014) and... 95
Fig. 36. Comparison between the measured(Othman et al., 2014) and the... 96
Fig. 37. Comparison between the measured (Othman et al., 2014) and the... 97
Fig. 38. Comparison between the measured (Othman et al., 2014) and the... 98
Fig. 39. Spatial distribution for Large-Scale method 99
Fig. 40. Comparison between the measured (Othman et al., 2014) and... 100
Fig. 41. Present condition of submerged vegetation zone 103
Fig. 42. Schematic diagram of submerged vegetation zone 103
Fig. 43. Schematic diagram of submerged vegetation zone for hydraulic... 104
Fig. 44. Schematic diagram of measurement area velocity field at front... 106
Fig. 45. Schematic diagram of free surface capturing 107
Fig. 46. Definition sketch of numerical wave tank due to submerged... 109
Fig. 47. Definition sketch of numerical wave tank based on the hydraulic... 110
Fig. 48. Conparison between the measured (Asano et al., 1988) and the... 111
Fig. 49. Temporal and Spatial distribution of surface around vegeatation... 112
Fig. 50. Temporal and Spatial distribution of surface around vegeatation... 113
Fig. 51. Time-series of non-dimensional free surface elevations in... 114
Fig. 52. Distributions of wave reflection, transmission and dissipation... 115
Fig. 53. Distributions of wave reflection, transmission and dissipation... 115
Fig. 54. Spatial distribution of wave height around flexible vegetation zone... 115
Fig. 55. Spatial distribution of wave height around rigid vegetation zone... 116
Fig. 56. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around submerged... 117
Fig. 57. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around flexible... 118
Fig. 58. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around rigid... 119
Fig. 59. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around... 119
Fig. 60. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around flexible... 121
Fig. 61. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around flexible... 122
Fig. 62. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around rigid... 123
Fig. 63. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around rigid... 123
Fig. 64. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around... 124
Fig. 65. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around rigid... 124
Fig. 66. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around flexible... 126
Fig. 67. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around flexible... 126
Fig. 68. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around rigid... 127
Fig. 69. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around rigid... 128
Fig. 70. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around... 128
Fig. 71. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around rigid... 129
Fig. 72. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around flexible... 130
Fig. 73. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around flexible... 131
Fig. 74. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around rigid... 132
Fig. 75. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around rigid... 133
Fig. 76. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around... 133
Fig. 77. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around rigid... 133
Fig. 78. Spatial distribution of velocity field around flexible vegetation... 135
Fig. 79. Spatial distribution of velocity field around rigid vegetation zone 136
Fig. 80. Spatial distribution of vertical velocity due to PIV 136
Fig. 81. Spatial distribution of velocity, vorticity and turbulence intensity... 137
Fig. 82. Spatial distribution of velocity, vorticity and turbulence intensity... 138
Fig. 83. Spatial distribution of velocity, vorticity and turbulence intensity... 138
Fig. 84. Vertical distribution of mean velocity around submerged... 139
Fig. 85. Definition sketch of numerical wave tank ACRs method at sandy... 140
Fig. 86. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around... 141
Fig. 87. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional mean water level around... 141
Fig. 88. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 143
Fig. 89. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 144
Fig. 90. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 144
Fig. 91. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 144
Fig. 92. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 144
Fig. 93. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 146
Fig. 94. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 146
Fig. 95. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 146
Fig. 96. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 147
Fig. 97. Spatial distribution for sediment transport around swash zone... 147
Fig. 98. Behavior of the sediment transport in swash zone 148
Fig. 99. Behavior of the sediment transport in swash zone with flexibel... 148
Fig. 100. Behavior of the sediment transport in swash zone with rigid... 149
Fig. 101. Coastal formed by wave attenuation and erosion control for... 151
Fig. 102. Schematic diagram of the wave basin including the ACRs... 151
Fig. 103. Schematic diagram of the wave basin including the ACRs... 152
Fig. 104. Materials and structures for the hydraulic experiment 154
Fig. 105. Defintion sketch of numerical wave tank due to submerged... 155
Fig. 106. Defintion sketch of numerical wave tank based on the hydraulic... 156
Fig. 107. Comparison between the measured hydraulic experiment and the... 157
Fig. 108. Spatial distribution of surface elevations around ACRs with... 158
Fig. 109. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around... 160
Fig. 110. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around ACRs... 161
Fig. 111. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around ACRs... 162
Fig. 112. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around ACRs... 162
Fig. 113. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around ACRs... 163
Fig. 114. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around ACRs... 164
Fig. 115. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around... 164
Fig. 116. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around ACRs... 166
Fig. 117. Spatial distribution of wave and velocity fields around ACRs... 167
Fig. 118. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around... 167
Fig. 119. Spatial distribution of velocity, vorticity and turbulence intensity... 169
Fig. 120. Spatial distribution of velocity, vorticity and turbulence intensity... 170
Fig. 121. Spatial distribution of velocity, vorticity and turbulence intensity... 170
Fig. 122. Vertical distribution of mean velocity around submerged... 171
Fig. 123. Definition sketch of numerical wave tank ACRs method at sandy... 172
Fig. 124. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional wave heights around... 173
Fig. 125. Spatial distribution of non-dimensional mean water level around... 173
Fig. 126. Spatial distribution for behavior around ACRs method under... 175
Fig. 127. Spatial distribution for behavior around ACRs method under... 175
Fig. 128. Spatial distribution for behavior around ACRs method under... 176
Fig. 129. Spatial distribution for behavior around ACRs method under... 177
Fig. 130. Spatial distribution for behavior around ACRs method under... 177
Fig. 131. Spatial distribution for behavior around ACRs method under... 178
Fig. 132. Behavior of the sediment transport in swash zone 178
Fig. 133. Behavior of the sediment transport in swash zone with ACRs... 179
Fig. 134. Behavior of the sediment transport in swash zone with ACRs... 179
On sand coasts, coastal erosion causes sand to move to the outer sea and the coastal side, resulting in coastline retreat and the collapse of coastal roads. Many specialists have analyzed and researched solutions for this phenomenon, with many studies still being conducted to establish a mechanism that analyzes the exact cause of the problem. Among these, critical depth for sand movement, critical wave height for sand movement, and critical velocity for sand movement were established to analyze coastal drift regarding the depth of water and waves that initiate wave-induced sediment movement. The movement state of individual sand particles according to the hydraulic force acting at the time when the sediment starts to move is classified as follows: the limit where a few of the protruding particles in the sea bottom initiate the movement (the initial movement limit), the limit where almost all the particles in the first layer of the surface layer of the sea bottom move (the frontal movement limit), the limit where the sands in the surface layer move collectively in the direction of the wave (the surface movement limit), and the limit where significant movement of the drift sand occurs so that the change of water depth is clearly visible (the full movement limit). As a dynamic parameter related to these movement limits, the ratio of shear resistance of the sediment to bottom shear force by waves in external force was described as the number of shields. Meanwhile, the terrain variation prediction model using the drift amount formula obtained from the experience of the hydraulic model experiment applying the limit shear flow rate does not consider the dynamic behavior of the sediment constituting the ground. Therefore, this study considered the behavior of individual particles through the Lagrangian approach, and also performed numerical simulation on the movement limit of individual sediment through the interaction analysis of the discrete element method (DEM) and a wave field model that can reproduce the physical properties of the sand. The behavior of individual particles according to the physical properties of the sand is accurately reproduced, and through numerical analysis, the movement state according to the interaction of critical depth and critical wave height for sand movement (velocity) is also well represented.
To control initial sediment transport in the coastal area, an artificial coral reefs (ACRs) method and a vegetation zone method were developed as soft defenses through a hydraulic model experiment. The effectiveness and validity of the numerical model using a NWT-DEM two-way coupled model was verified through comparison with experimental data. Furthermore, the wave/flow control characteristics were numerically compared according to the specifications of the soft defenses to control coastal erosion in a numerical wave tank. The numerical wave tank was prepared for analysis of initial sediment transport in a swash zone according to the optimum specifications of these soft defenses. The initial sediment transport in the swash zone decreased by the wave/flow control characteristics through the soft defenses.
The results of this study demonstrated that the ACRs method and aquatic vegetation zone method for controlling coastal erosion are economical compared to the gravity type coastal structures and have a high utilization potential because they can efficiently control the initial sediment transport.*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.