권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Contents
Analysis of the LiF:Mg,Cu,Si TL and the LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL glow curves by using general approximation plus model / In-Su Chang ; Jung-Il Lee ; Jang-Lyul Kim ; Mi-Ae Oh ; Ki-Soo Chung 1
[요약] 1
1. Introduction 1
2. Theory 2
2.1. Thermoluminescence 2
2.2. Figure of Merits(FOM) 2
2.3. Analysis Ability of the Glow Curve Analysis Models 4
3. Materials and methods 6
3.1. TLD Materials 6
3.2. Measurement of Glow Curve 6
4. Results and discussion 6
4.1. Analyzed Glow Curve 6
4.2. Analyzed Parameters 8
5. Conclusion 9
References 9
In this paper, we used computerized glow curve deconvolution (CGCD) software with several models for the simulation of
a TL glow curve which was used for analysis. By using the general approximation plus model, parameters values of the
glow curve were analyzed and compared with the other models parameters (general approximation, mixed order kinetics,
general order kinetics). The LiF:Mg,Cu,Si and the LiF:Mg,Cu,P material were used for the glow curve analysis. And we
based on figure of merits (FOM) which was the goodness of the fitting that was monitored through the value between
analysis model and TLD materials. The ideal value of FOM is 0 which represents a perfect fit. The main glow peak makes
the most effect of radiation dose assessment of TLD materials. The main peak of the LiF:Mg,Cu,Si materials has a
intensity rate 80.76% of the whole TL glow intensity, and that of LiF:Mg,Cu,P materials has a intensity rate 68.07% of the
whole TL glow intensity. The activation energy of LiF:Mg,Cu,Si was analyzed as 2.39 eV by result of the general
approximation plus(GAP) model. In the case of mixed order kinetics (MOK), the activation energy was analyzed as 2.29
eV. The activation energy was analyzed as 2.38 eV by the general order kinetics (GOK) model. In the case of LiF:Mg,Cu,P
TLD, the activation energy was analyzed as 2.39 eV by result of the GAP model. In the case of MOK, the activation energy
was analyzed as 2.55 eV. The activation energy was analyzed as 2.51 eV by the GOK model. The R value means different
ratio of retrapping?recombination. The R value of LiF:Mg,Cu,Si TLD main peak analyzed as 1.12 x 10?6 and α value
analyzed as 1.0 x 10?3. The R of LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLD analyzed as 7.91 x 10?4, the α value means different ratio of initial
thermally trapped electron density?initial trapped electron density (include thermally disconnected trap electrons density).
The α value was analyzed as 9.17 x 10?1 which was the difference from LiF:Mg,Cu,Si TLD. The deep trap electron density
of LiF:Mg,Cu,Si was higher than the deep trap electron density of LiF:Mg,Cu,P.| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 목차 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis of the LiF:Mg,Cu,Si TL and the LiF:Mg,Cu,P TL glow curves by using general approximation plus model | In-Su Chang ;Jung-Il Lee ;Jang-Lyul Kim ;Mi-Ae Oh ;Ki-Soo Chung | pp.155-164 |
|
보기 |
| Operational experience of a two-dosimeter algorithm for better estimation of effective dose at Korean nuclear power plants | Hee Geun Kim ;Tae Young Kong | pp.165-169 |
|
보기 |
| 비상시 환경방사능 모니터링을 위한 공기부유진 시료의 감마선에너지 스펙트럼에 대한 핵종판별 | 변종인 ;윤석원 ;최희열 ;임성아 ;이동명 ;윤주용 | pp.170-175 |
|
보기 |
| 원전 종사자의 말단선량평가를 위한 고피폭 접촉 방사선장 특성분석 | 김희근 ;공태영 | pp.176-183 |
|
보기 |
| 중수로원전 방사선작업종사자의 공기중 삼중수소 섭취 후 뇨시료 제출 시간이 체내 삼중수소 농도에 미치는 영향 분석 | 김희근 ;공태영 ;정우태 ;김석태 | pp.184-189 |
|
보기 |
| 원전주변 환경시료의 766 keV 감마선에너지 피크에 대한 해석 | 김 완 ;이해영 ;양희선 ;박해수 ;김봉국 ;박환배 ;김홍주 ;이상훈 | pp.190-194 |
|
보기 |
| 원자력시설의 Carbon-14 방사성유출물에 대한 감시배경의 조사 | 김희근 ;공태영 ;정우태 ;김석태 | pp.195-200 |
|
보기 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내05
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.