본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

초록보기

The present survey was conducted to provide basic information on automatic milking system(AMS) in relation to purchase motive, milk yield and quality, customer satisfaction, difficulties of operation and customer suggestions, etc. Purchase motives of AMS were insufficient labor(44%), planning of dairy experience farm(25%), better performance of high yield cows(19%) and others(6%), respectively. Average cow performance after using AMS was 30.9l/d for milk yield, 3.9% for milk fat, 9,100/ml for bacterial counts. Sixty-eight percentage of respondents were very positive in response to AMS use for their successors but 18% were negative. The AMS operators were owner(44%), successor(44%), wife(6%) and company worker(6%), respectively. The most difficulty(31%) in using AMS was operating the system and complicated program manual. The rate of response to system error and breakdown was 25%. The reasons for culling cow after using AMS were mastitis(28%), reproduction failure(19%), incorrect teat placement(12%), metabolic disease(7%) and others(14%), respectively. Fifty-six percentages of the respondents made AMS maintenance contract and 44% did not. Average annual cost of the maintenance contract was 6,580,000 won. Average score for AMS satisfaction measurement(1 to 5 range) was 3.2 with decrease of labor cost 3.7, company A/S 3.6, increase of milk yield 3.2 and decrease of somatic cell count 2.8, respectively. Suggestions for the higher efficiency in using AMS were selecting cows with correct udder shape and teat placement, proper environment, capital and land, and attitude for continuous observation. Systematic consulting was highly required for AMS companies followed by low cost for AMS setup and systematization of A/S.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
한우농가의 동물약품 이용실태 분석 김계웅, 구승회 pp.1-10

젖소의 성장 및 생산 단계에 따른 분뇨배설량 및 성분의 변화 이현준, 이왕식, 김현섭, 조원모, 양승학, 기광석, 김상범, 박중국 pp.11-22
구제역 방제를 위한 중소형 살포기의 성능실험 및 영상처리를 이용한 분석 김재열, 홍준택, 감동환, 민병로 pp.23-32

남극 크릴새우의 고액분리 기술개발 오인환, 장철환, 김운걸, 양상엽 pp.33-38
자동착유시스템 설치농가의 설치 후 만족도에 관한 실태조사 기광석, 김종형, 정영훈, 김윤호, 박성재, 김상범, 이왕식, 이현준, 조원모, 백광수 [외] pp.39-48

돈분과 유기성 부산물을 혼합한 혐기소화에서 바이오가스 생산 김운걸, 오인환, 양상엽, 이경민, 이승일 pp.49-54

참고문헌 (23건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 농림수산식품부, 농촌진흥청. 2010. 2009년도 가축개량관련자료. 미소장
2 백광수, 박성재, 전병순, 임현주, 김현섭, 김원호. 2010. 젖소의 산차, 산유단계 및 산유능력별 도태원인 분석. 한국동물번식학회 2010년도 춘계학술대회. p.113 미소장
3 서울우유협동조합. 2010. 2009년 목장 종합 실태조사 결과. 격월간 서울우유 9.10월호. p102-111. 미소장
4 신규재, 한성익, 장승호. 2007. 착유로봇 시스템 개발. 농림부 농림기술개발사업 최종연구보고서. 미소장
5 Bennedsgaard, T. W., M. D. Rasmussen, L. H. Pedersen, and M. Bjerring. 2006. Changes in herd health and conversion to automatic milking systems. Page 864 in Proc. 11th Int. Symp. Vet. Epidemiol. Econ. Cairns, Australia. 미소장
6 de Koning, K., and J. Rodenburg. 2004. Automatic Milking: State of the art in Europe and North America. Pages 27-37 in Proc. Automatic Milking-A Better Under- standing. Lelystad, the Netherlands. Wageningen Acad. Publ., Wageningen, the Netherlands. 미소장
7 Economics of robot application 네이버 미소장
8 Justesen, P. and M. D. Rasmussen. 2000. Improvements of milk quality by the Danish AMS self monitoring programme. Pages 83-88 in Proc. Int. Symp. Robotic Milking, Lelystad, the Netherlands. Wageninen Pers, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 미소장
9 Klei, L. R., J. M. Lynch, D. M. Barbano, P. A. Oltenacu, A. J. Lednor, and D. K. Bandler. 1997. Influences of milking three times a day on milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 80:427-436. 미소장
10 Klungel, G. H., B. A. Slaghuis, and H. Hogeveen. 2000. The effect of the intro- duction of automatic milking systems on milk quality. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1998-2003. 미소장
11 Kruip, T. A. M., H. Morice, M. Robert, and W. Ouweltjes. 2002. Robotic milking and its effect on fertility and cell counts. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2576-2581. 미소장
12 Lind, O., A. H. Ipema, C. de Koning, T. T. Mottram, and H. -J. Hermann. 2000. Automatic milking: reality, challenges and opportunities. Pages 19-31 in 287 Proc. Robotic Milking, Proc. Int. Symp., Lelystad, the Netherlands. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 미소장
13 Extended calving interval in combination with milking two or three times per day: effects on milk production and milk composition 네이버 미소장
14 Pettersson, G., I. Berglund, A. Husfloen, R. Tukiainen, and K. Svennersten-Sjaunja. 2002. Effects of temporal technical stopp- ages in an AMS on bulk milk SCC and number of positive bacterial tests on udder quarter level. Pages 43-45 in NJF Report 337. Technology for milking and housing of dairy cows. Hamar, Norway. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 미소장
15 Rasmussen, M. D., E. Frimer, Z. Horvath, and N. E. Jensen. 1990. Comparison of a standard and variable milking routine. J. Dairy Sci. 73:3472-3480. 미소장
16 Udder health of cows milked automatically 네이버 미소장
17 Rasmussen, M. D., M. Bjerring, P. Justesen, and L. Jepsen. 2002. Milk quality on Danish farms with automatic milking systems. J. Dairy Sci. 85:2869-2878. 미소장
18 Rotz C. A., C. U. Coiner, and K. J. Soder. 2003. Automatic milking systems, farm size, and milk production. J. Dairy Sci. 86:4167-4177. 미소장
19 Speroni, M., G. Pirlo, and S. Lolli. 2006. Effect of automatic milking systems on milk yield in a hot environment. J. Dairy Sci. 89:4687-4693. 미소장
20 Svennersten-Sjaunja, K., I. Berglund, and G. Pettersson. 2000. The milking process in an automated milking system, evaluation of milk yield, teat condition and udder health. Pages 277-287 in Proc. Robotic Milking Proc. Int. Symp., Lelystad, the Netherlands. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, the Netherlands. 미소장
21 Svennersten-Sjaunja K. M. and G. Pettersson. 2007. Pros and cons of automatic milking in Europe. J Anim Sci 2008. 86:37-46. 미소장
22 Wanger-Storch A. M., R. W. Palmer. 2003. Feeding behaviour, milking behaviour, and milk yields of cows milked in a palor versus an automatic milking system. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1494-1502. 미소장
23 Effects of automatic milking system on teat tissues, intramammary infections and somatic cell counts 네이버 미소장