본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

결과 내 검색

동의어 포함

고급검색

인명/단체명

저자정보 상세정보
인명/단체명을 입력하세요.

키워드

  • 대표어

  • 외국어

-

초록보기

본 연구는 1990년대 중반부터 수력발전을 둘러싼 메콩유역의 상류국가(중국)와 네 개의 하류국가들(라오스, 태국, 베트남, 캄보디아) 간의 힘의 불균형을 분석한다. 분석의 틀로서 하이드로-헤게모니(hydro-hegemony) 이론을 적용하여 유역국가 간 상호작용을 평가한다. 특히, 본 연구는 첫째, 헤게모니 국가인 중국은 메콩지역에 얼마나 많은 영향력을 가지고 있는지 그리고 중국은 그 헤게모니 위치를 어떻게 유지하고 있는가를 살펴본다. 둘째, 중국과 주변 국가 간의 상호작용은 갈등과 협력 중에 무엇을 야기하는지 혹은 메콩강을 둘러싼 중국의 태도 변화가 있는가 등과 같은 연구 질문에 대해 논의한다. 하류국가에 잠재적으로 유해한 영향을 고려한다면, 중국의 협력적 태도는 반드시 필요하다. 중국은 자국의 일방적인 상류의 수력발전에 대한 국제적 비난과 하류 국가의 불만, 그리고 하류 국가들과의 협력을 통한 편익 증가에 따라 점진적으로 협조적으로 태도를 변하였다. 특히, 메콩지역의 협력은 중국 윈난성(Yunnan Province)의 빈곤감소와 지역경제 활성화에 영향을 미치고 비전통적 수자원(교통과 에너지, 관광과 무역 등) 분야의 협력이 증진됨으로서 협력이익이 증가하고 있다. 중국의 협력적 태도로의 변화는 메콩지역에 대한 지역 협력을 강화하려는 중국의 의지를 나타낸다. 하지만, 중국은 아시아인프라투자은행(Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, AIIB)의 재정적 지원과 일대일로(One Belt One Road, OBOR)의 기조를 바탕으로 자국의 패권(hegemon)을 유지하며 중국 중심의 협력체계를 추구하고 있다. 메콩유역 협력의 정착을 위해서는 꾸준한 국제협력을 통하여 물을 중심으로 한 지역패권주의를 경계하는 노력이 더욱 필요하다.

This research analyzes the power asymmetry over hydropower development between the upstream state, China and the four downstream states, Laos, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia in the Mekong River Basin since the mid-1990s. The hydro-hegemony approach is deployed to evaluate the relationships between the riparian states. This research will attempt to answer the following questions. First, how much does China have an influence on the Mekong River Basin and how can China (hegemon) maintain its hegemonic position? Second, do the interactions between China and the riparian states lead to conflict cooperation, and there is any behavioral change of China toward cooperation? Considering potential detrimental impacts of the Chinese dams on downstream, China’s cooperative attitude is necessary. Criticism about China's unilateral behavior in hydropower development and increased benefits through cooperation have transformed China's position into a cooperative mode gradually. In particular, cooperation in the Mekong River Basin has resulted in poverty reduction and boosting local economies in the Yunnan Province, and the development of non-water sectors (transportation, energy, tourism and industries) has allowed China to realize the shared benefits of cooperation with the downstream states. China's gradual acceptance of cooperation connotes a possibility of regional cooperation in the Mekong River Basin. However, China appears to establish its own architecture of cooperation mechanism in the Mekong River Basin by sustaining their hegemon position through the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and the One Belt One Road initiative. In order to strengthen the cooperation in the Mekong River Basin, it is necessary to be vigilant regarding the water-centered regional hegemonism through continuous international cooperation.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
베트남 당 응와이의 科試 一考察 = A study on the imperial examination of Dang Ngoai in Vietnam 송정남 pp.3-32

Power Asymmetry over Hydropower Development in the Mekong River Basin = 수력발전을 통한 메콩지역 힘의 불균형 평가 Yookyung Lee, Seungho Lee, Ilpyo Hong pp.109-150

Vietnam's Treaty Commitment and Legal Reform for Signaling and Interlocking = 신호발송과 제도적 구속을 위한 베트남의 국제조약의 이행과 법제개혁 Youcheer Kim pp.151-173

"부족"의 상품화와 전통의 재창조 = Commercializing the Tribe in the Tourism and the Reinvention of the Tradition in Sumba, Indonesia : 인도네시아 숨바 섬의 부족 관광 연구 송승원 pp.33-61

The Enigma of Religious Freedom in Islamic Malaysia Myengkyo Seo pp.85-108

베트남인 한국어 학습자 대상 SILL 문항분석 및 요인분석 연구 = A Study on the Item Analysis and Factor Analysis of SILL for Vietnamese Learners of Korean 홍종명 pp.63-83

NGHIÊN CỨU KHOA HỌC XÃ HỘI VÀ NHÂN VĂN Ở VIỆT NAM TRONG BỐI CẢNH TOÀN CẦU = Research of Social Sciences and Humaninies in Veitnam in a Global Context Trần Thị Mai Nhân pp.175-197

참고문헌 (101건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 ADB. (2016a). Greater Mekong Subregion Energy Sector Assessment, Strategy, and Road Map. Philippines: ADB. 미소장
2 ADB. (2016b, August). Greater Mekong Subregion Statistics on Growth Infrastructure and Trade. Paper presented at the eighth economic Corridors Forum, Phnom Penh, Cambodia. 미소장
3 AFP. (2010, November 17). Chinese Dams Not to Blame for Low Mekong Levels: Cambodia PM. Terradaily. Retrieved from http://www.terradaily.com/reports/Chinese_dams_not_to_blame_fo r_low_Mekong_levels_Cambodia_PM_999.html. 미소장
4 Ahuja, A. (2010, April 5). China says Dams not to Blame for Low Mekong Levels. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mekong-idUSTRE6341A620100405. 미소장
5 Allan, J. (2002). The Middle East water question: Hydropolitics and the global economy (Vol. 2). Ib Tauris. 미소장
6 Two Faces of Power 네이버 미소장
7 BBC News. (2010, April 5). China Rejects Mekong Dam Claims. BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/8603112.stm. 미소장
8 Bernauer, T. (2002). Explaining success and failure in international river management. Aquatic Sciences-Research Across Boundaries, 64(1), 1-19. 미소장
9 China's Continuous Dam-building on the Mekong River 네이버 미소장
10 Biba, S. (2016, February 1). China drives water cooperation with Mekong countries. Thethirdpole. Retrieved from https://www.thethirdpole.net/2016/02/01/china-drives-water-cooperation-with-mekong-countries/. 미소장
11 Buntaine, M. (2007, May). Regional Integration, Issue Fragmentation, and Cooperative Environmental Governance in the Lancang-Mekong River Basin. In Amsterdam Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change May. 미소장
12 Cascão, A., & Zeitoun, M. (2010). Power, hegemony and critical hydropolitics. Transboundary water management. principles and practice, 27, 42. 미소장
13 CGIAR. (2017). Dam maps. Retrieved from http://wle-mekong.cgiar.org/maps. 미소장
14 Mekong Dams and the Perils of Peace 네이버 미소장
15 Dore, J., & Yu, X. (2004). Yunnan hydropower expansion: update on China’s energy industry reforms and the Nu, Lancang and Jinsha hydropower dams. Chiang Mai University’s unit for social and environmental research, and Green Watershed. 미소장
16 SUB-REGIONAL COOPERATION IN SOUTHEAST ASIA: THE MEKONG BASIN 네이버 미소장
17 Large-Scale Hydrological Changes in Tropical Asia: Prospects for Riverine Biodiversity 네이버 미소장
18 Earle, A., Jägerskog, A., & Öjendal, J. (2010). Introduction: setting the scene for transboundary water management approaches. Transboundary water management: principles and practice. Earthscan, London. 미소장
19 Economist. (2011, November 12). One dam thing after another. The Economists. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/21538158. 미소장
20 Hydropolitics: Grounds for Despair, Reasons for Hope 네이버 미소장
21 Finger, M., Tamiotti, L., &Allouche, J. (2006). Introduction: conceptual elements. The multi-governance of water: four case studies, 1-42. 미소장
22 The Political Context of Conflict and Cooperation Over International River Basins 네이버 미소장
23 Fuller, T. (2011, April 17). Decision Looms for Laos Dam, but Impact is Unclear. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/18/world/asia/18mekong.html. 미소장
24 Gajaseni, N., Heal, O. W., & Edwards-Jones, G. (2006). The Mekong river basin: Comprehensive water governance. The Multi-Governance of Water—Four Cases Studies, 57. 미소장
25 Goh, E. (2001). The hydro-politics of the Mekong River Basin:regional cooperation and environmental security. Non-Traditional Security Issues in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Select Publishing (Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies), 468-506. 미소장
26 Goh, E. (2004). China in the Mekong River basin: the regional security implications of resource development on the Lancang Jiang. 미소장
27 Goh, E. (2007). Developing the Mekong: Regionalism and regional security in China-Southeast Asian relations (No. 387). Routledge. 미소장
28 Cooperation on International Rivers: A Continuum for Securing and Sharing Benefits 네이버 미소장
29 Water and international conflict 네이버 미소장
30 Transboundary River Cooperation and the Regional Public Good: The Case of the Mekong River 네이버 미소장
31 Hansson, S., Hellberg, S., & Öjendal, J. (2011). Politics and development in a transboundary watershed: The case of the lower Mekong Basin. In Politics and Development in a Transboundary Watershed (pp. 1-18). Springer Netherlands. 미소장
32 The changing political dynamics of dam building on the Mekong 네이버 미소장
33 Hirsch, P., Jensen, K. M., Boer, B., Carrard, N., Fitz Gerald, S., & Lyster, R. (2006). National interests and transboundary water governance in the Mekong (pp. 26-27). Australian Mekong Resource Centre, in collaboration with Danish International Development Assistance. 미소장
34 ICEM. (2010). Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) of Hydropower on the Mekong Mainstream. ICEM Australia. Retrieved from http://www.icem.com.au/documents/envassessment/mrc_sea_hp/SEA_Final_Report_Oct_2010.pdf. 미소장
35 Jägerskog, A. (2002). Contributions of regime theory in understanding interstate water cooperation: lessons learned in the Jordan River Basin. 미소장
36 Jägerskog, A. (2007). Why States Co-operate over Shared Water: The Water Negotiations in the Jordan River Basin. Water Resources in the Middle East: Israel-Palestinian Water Issues–From Conflict to Cooperation, 2, 195-202. 미소장
37 Hydropolitical Complexes and Asymmetrical Power: Conflict, Cooperation, and Governance of International River Systems 네이버 미소장
38 Kemp, M. (2012, Febuary 7). China Presses Myanmar on Stalled Dam. Asia Times Online. Retrieved from http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/NB07Ae01.html. 미소장
39 The Demand for International Regimes 네이버 미소장
40 Keskinen, M., Mehtonen, K., & Varis, O. (2008). Transboundary cooperation vs. internal ambitions: The role of China and Cambodia in the Mekong region. International water security:Domestic threats and opportunities, 79, 109. 미소장
41 Kibaroğlu, A. (ed.). (2002). Building a regime for the waters of the Euphrates-Tigris river basin (Vol. 7). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. 미소장
42 Sediment-related impacts due to upstream reservoir trapping, the Lower Mekong River 네이버 미소장
43 Lee, S. (2013). Hydropower development in the Mekong River Basin–analysis through the hydro hegemony approach. Southeast Asia Research, 23(1), 227-264. 미소장
44 Benefit sharing in the Mekong River basin 네이버 미소장
45 Lee, S. (2017, June). China and the Mekong River Countries:collaboration for shared benefit? Presented at Water-Energy -Development: Challenges and Chances for Sustainable Water Management in China. Free University of Berlin, Germany. 미소장
46 Lee, G., & Scurrah, N. (2009). Power and responsibility: the Mekong river commission and lower Mekong mainstream dams. 미소장
47 POLITICS OF INTERNATIONAL RIVER BASIN COOPERATION AND MANAGEMENT 네이버 미소장
48 Hydropower in the Mekong River Basin: A Balancing Test 네이버 미소장
49 Regional hydropolitics of the transboundary impacts of the Lancang cascade dams 네이버 미소장
50 Lowi, M. (1995). Water and power: The politics of a scarce resource in the Jordan River basin (Vol. 31). Cambridge University Press. 미소장
51 Lu, X. X., & Siew, R. Y. (2006). Water discharge and sediment flux changes over the past decades in the Lower Mekong River:possible impacts of the Chinese dams. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 10(2), 181-195. 미소장
52 Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. 미소장
53 Macan-Markar, M. (2011). Vietnam, Laos Split over Mekong Dam. INTER PRESS SERVICE. Retrieved from http://www.ipsnews.net/2011/03/vietnam-laos-split-over-mekong-dam/. 미소장
54 Magee, D. (2006). New energy geographics: powershed politics and hydropower decision making in Yunnan, China. 미소장
55 Magee, D. (2011). The dragon upstream: China’s role in Lancang-Mekong development. In Politics and development in a transboundary watershed (pp. 171-193). Springer Netherlands. 미소장
56 Hydropower and sustainability: Resilience and vulnerability in China's powersheds 네이버 미소장
57 Mehtonen, K. (2008). Do the downstream countries oppose the upstream dams. Modern myths of the Mekong, 161-173. 미소장
58 China's Performance in International Resource Politics: Lessons from the Mekong 네이버 미소장
59 Middleton, C., Garcia, J., &Foran, T. (2009). Old and new hydropower players in the Mekong region: Agendas and strategies. Contested waterscapes in the Mekong region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance, 23-54. 미소장
60 Mineta, S. (2011, December). China’s Impact on the Use of Water Resources in the Greater Mekong Sub-region. Paper presented at International Seminar on 20 Years of GMS: The Changes to Changes, Chiang Mai, Thailand. 미소장
61 MRC. (1995). Mekong River Commission towards Sustainable Development Annual Report. Thailand: MRC. 미소장
62 MRC. (2002). Annual Report 2002. Phnom Penh. Cambodia: MRC. 미소장
63 MRC. (2002). Closer Cooperation with China needed. MRC. 미소장
64 MRC. (2004). Mekong’s Low Flows Linked to Drought. MRC. 미소장
65 MRC. (2004). Ninth Dialogue Meeting. Lao PDR: MRC. 미소장
66 MRC. (2005). Twenty-First Meeting of the Joint Committee. Cambodia:MRC. 미소장
67 MRC. (2010). State of the Basin Report 2010. Lao PDR: MRC. 미소장
68 MRC. (2016). Basin Development Strategy 2016-2020 for the Lower Mekong Basin. Cambodia: MRC. Retrieved from http://www.mrcmekong.org/assets/Publications/strategies-workprog /MRC-BDP-strategy-complete-final-02.16.pdf. 미소장
69 MRC. (2017). MRC (http://www.mrcmekong.org). 미소장
70 Interstate negotiation mechanisms for cooperation in the Mekong river basin 네이버 미소장
71 Reassessing Water Security in the Mekong: The Chinese Rapprochement with Southeast Asia 네이버 미소장
72 The Impact of Continued Mekong Basin Hydropower Development on Local Livelihoods 네이버 미소장
73 Economic Integration of Yunnan with the Greater Mekong Subregion * 네이버 미소장
74 Praiwan, Y. (2013, October 12). Thailand signs GMS power project accord with China. Bangkok Post. Retrieved from http://www.bangkokpost.com/print/374305/. 미소장
75 Priscoli, J., & Wolf, A. (2009). Managing and transforming water conflicts. Cambridge University Press. 미소장
76 Pukinskis, I., & Geheb, K. (2012). The Impacts of Dams on the Fisheries of the Mekong. State of Knowledge Series, 1. 미소장
77 Sarkkula, J., Keskinen, M., Koponen, J., Kummu, M., Richey, J. E., & Varis, O. (2009). Hydropower in the Mekong region: what are the likely impacts upon fisheries?. Contested waterscapes in the Mekong Region: Hydropower, livelihoods and governance, 227-249. 미소장
78 Schmeier, S. (2010). Regional cooperation efforts in the Mekong river basin: mitigating river-related security threats and promoting regional development. Australian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 2(2), 28-52. 미소장
79 Starr, P. (2003). The people’s highway: past, present and future transport on the Mekong River system. Mekong Development Series, (3). 미소장
80 Examining China's Hydro-Behaviour: Peaceful or Assertive? 네이버 미소장
81 Rescaling the Chinese state and regionalization in the Great Mekong Subregion 네이버 미소장
82 Tian, J. (2016). ‘One Belt and One Road’: Connecting China and the world. Global Infrastructure Initiative website. http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/one-belt-a nd-one-road-connecting-china-and-the-world. 미소장
83 Tom, F. (2017, February 3). Blasting the Mekong for commercial shipping. Thethirdpole. Retrieved from https://www.thethirdpole.net/2017/02/03/blasting-the-mekong-for-commercial-shipping/. 미소장
84 Trong, T. (2012, May 2). As Mekong Leaders Gather, Public Awaits Answers on Xayaburi Dam. IUCN. Retrieved from https://www.iucn.org/content/mekong-leaders-gather-public-awaitsanswers-xayaburi-dam. 미소장
85 United Nations General Assembly. (1997). Convention On Law Of Non-Navigational Uses Of International Watercourses. United Nation. Retrived from http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/8_3_1997.pdf. 미소장
86 UNESCAP. (2017, April 25). Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific Seventy-third session. UNESCAP. Retrieved from https://www.unescap.org/commission/73/document/E73_INF2E.pdf. 미소장
87 Vinh, N. (2016, November 1). The third domino in the series of mainstream dams on the lower Mekong in Laos. Viet Ecology Foundation (VEF), Retrieved from http://www.vietecology.org/Article/Article/187. 미소장
88 Warner, J., & Wegerich, K. (2010). Is water politics? Towards international water relations. The politics of water: A survey, 3-18. 미소장
89 Hegemony and asymmetry: multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers 네이버 미소장
90 Cooperation and conflict in the Mekong river basin 네이버 미소장
91 The Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database Project 네이버 미소장
92 Wolf, A. (2009). A long-term view of water and security: international waters, national issues and regional tensions. In The Jordan River and Dead Sea Basin (pp. 3-19). Springer, Dordrecht. 미소장
93 Xinhua News. (2017, March 10). China, Mekong countries celebrate launch of LMC China Secretariat. Xinhua News. Retrieved from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-03/10/c_136119140.htm. 미소장
94 Yang, A. (2010, November 19). Cambodia: China Not Behind Mekong Floods. Chinadaily. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2010-11/19/content_11574678.htm. 미소장
95 Yang, E., Seok, J., Kim, A., & Kim, Y. (2016). The Challenge of hydropower development in the Mekong River Basin. Korea Energy Economics Institute World Energy Market Insight, 16(31), 3-23. 미소장
96 China’s Lancang Dam Cascade and Transnational Activism in the Mekong Region 네이버 미소장
97 Applying hegemony and power theory to transboundary water analysis 네이버 미소장
98 Hydro-hegemony - a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts 네이버 미소장
99 Transboundary water interaction I: reconsidering conflict and cooperation 네이버 미소장
100 Transboundary water interaction II: the influence of ‘soft’ power 네이버 미소장
101 Zhou, S. (2010, July). Strength Cooperation among Riparian Countries, Promote Basin-wide Joint Sustainable Development. Paper presented at the thrid Regional Stakeholder Forum on Basin Development Planning, Vientiane, Lao PDR. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차

권호

기사명 원문보기 기사목차
닫기