권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
| 번호 | 참고문헌 | 국회도서관 소장유무 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gregory DM, Guse LW, Dick DD, Russell CK. Patient safety: where is nursing education? J Nurs Educ. 2007;46(2):79-82. | 미소장 |
| 2 | Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306(9):978-88. | 미소장 |
| 3 | McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen MER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad. Med. 2011;86(6):706. | 미소장 |
| 4 | Higham H, Baxendale B. To err is human: use of simulation to enhance training and patient safety in anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(suppl_1):i106-i14. | 미소장 |
| 5 | Kalaniti K, Campbell DM. Simulation-based medical education:time for a pedagogical shift. Indian Pediatr. 2015;52(1):41-5. | 미소장 |
| 6 | Rudolph JW, Simon R, Raemer DB, Eppich WJ. Debriefing as formative assessment: closing performance gaps in medical education. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):1010-6. | 미소장 |
| 7 | Arora S, Ahmed M, Paige J, Nestel D, Runnacles J, Hull L, et al. Objective structured assessment of debriefing:bringing science to the art of debriefing in surgery. Ann. Surg. 2012;256(6):982-8. | 미소장 |
| 8 | Arora S, Runnacles J, Ahmed M, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Paige J, et al. The London handbook for debriefing:enhancing performance debriefing in clinical and simulated settings. London, UK: Deanery. 2012. | 미소장 |
| 9 | Abegglen S, Krieg A, Eigenmann H, Greif R. Objective Structured Assessment of Debriefing (OSAD) in simulation-based medical education: Translation and validation of the German version. PLoS One. 2020;15(12):e0244816. | 미소장 |
| 10 | Maneesriwongul W, Dixon JK. Instrument translation process: a methods review. J Adv Nurs. 2004;48(2):175-86. | 미소장 |
| 11 | Feldman M, Lazzara EH, Vanderbilt AA, DiazGranados D. Rater training to support high-stakes simulation-based assessments. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012;32(4):279-86. | 미소장 |
| 12 | Koo TK, Li MY, A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J. Chiropr. Med. 2016;15(2):155-63. | 미소장 |
| 13 | 전혜진. 간호사 대상 국내 시뮬레이션 교육 및 디브리핑의 효과에관한 통합적 고찰. 한국간호시뮬레이션 학회지. 2017;5(2):1-9. | 미소장 |
| 14 | 최동원. 학습자 주도 임상판단모델 기반 디브리핑이 간호대학생의비판적 사고성향, 학습관련 자기주도성, 문제해결과정 및 디브리핑경험에 미치는 효과. 한국간호시뮬레이션 학회지. 2019;7(2):83-96. | 미소장 |
| 15 | Hui CH, Triandis HC. Measurement in cross-cultural psychology:A review and comparison of strategies. J Cross Cult Psychol. 1985;16(2):131-52. | 미소장 |
| 16 | Chapman DW, Carter JF. Translation procedures for the cross cultural use of measurement instruments. Educ Eval Policy Anal. 1979;1(3):71-6. | 미소장 |
| 17 | Chung HS, Dieckmann P, Issenberg SB. It is time to consider cultural differences in debriefing. Simul Healthc. 2013;8(3):166-70. | 미소장 |
| 18 | Simon R, Raemer D, Rudolph J. Debriefing assessment for simulation in Healthcareⓒ (DASH) ⓒ. Rater’s handbook:The Center For Medical Simulation, Boston, MA; 2010. | 미소장 |
| 19 | Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul in Healthc. 2015;10(2):106-15. | 미소장 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.