PART I FOUNDATIONS 1 Introduction 1.1 Why Regulating Parties Matters 1.2 A Party System in Crisis 1.3 A Unique Challenge 2 The Supreme Court's Approach to Political Parties 2.1 The Baseline: Government Power to Regulate Political Parties 2.2 Guarantees and Limitations: Constitutional Constraints on Political Parties 2.3 A Shield: Political Parties and Constitutional Protection from Government 2.4 The Supreme Court as Election Law Policy-Maker 3 The Association versus the Individual 3.1 Constitutionalizing Associations 3.2 The Constitutional Paradox of the Party Plural, the Party Singular, and the State 3.3 The Challenge of Defining Party "Membership" 3.4 The Problem of Associational Rights for Political Parties 3.5 A Government Solution? 3.6 The Constitution and the Three Aspects of Party 3.7 The Party in the Electorate 3.8 The Party Organization 3.9 The Party in Government
PART II PARTY PRIMARIES 4 Setting the Stage 4.1 A Brief History of Primaries 4.2 Party Membership and the Many Forms of Primaries 4.3 Three Constitutional Rubrics 5 Primaries and the Party in the Electorate: The Right to Vote 5.1 Nader v. Schaffer and the Sidelining of the Party in the Electorate 5.2 The Tale of Voter A and Voter B 5.3 Voting Rights Challenges 6 Double Standards: Organizations over Individuals and Major over Minor Parties 6.1 The Inclusive Major Party and the Closed Primary State 6.2 The Inclusive Third Party and the Semi-closed State 6.3 The Misguided Judicial Takeover of Electoral Policy 7 Doubling Down on the Party Organization in Service of the Major Parties 7.1 Standing Up to the People's Chosen Electoral Policy 7.2 A Caveat for "Nonpartisan" Primaries
PART III THE PARTY, THE COURT, AND CAMPAIGN FINANCE LAW 8 Party Speech through Money 8.1 A Brief History of Campaign Finance Law 8.2 A Three-Tier Critique of Constitutionalized Party Campaign Finance 9 An Ill-Fitting Party Campaign Finance Jurisprudence 9.1 Parties and the Expenditure/Contribution Dichotomy 9.2 A "Complex Issue" 9.3 A Moving Target: Shifting Parties and Campaign Finance 9.4 Party or Government Campaign Finance? 9.5 Parties, Corruption, and the Soft Money Loophole 10 Parties and the Current Campaign Finance Landscape 10.1 Justice Breyer's Inconsistency and the Chiefs Transparency 10.2 A Decline in Party Influence over Campaign Finance 10.3 The Network Theory Conundrum 10.4 Parties and Campaign Finance: A Muddled Jurisprudential Legacy
PART IV PASSE EQUAL PROTECTION AND A WAY FORWARD 11 Party and Equality 11.1 The Ballot Access Quandary 11.2 Sore Losers and the Transition from Equality to Association 11.3 Freedom of Association, Spoilers, and Federalism 12 The Political Question: Is There Room for Equal Protection in Partisan Gerrymandering? 12.1 The Court's Reticent Gerrymandering Jurisprudence 12.2 A Big Picture That Is Not Encouraging 12.3 Partisanship as a Tool: Establishing Nonpartisan Redistricting Commissions 13 A Potential Solution: The Party System as a Public Forum 13.1 Political Parties as Government Speech? 13.2 A New Paradigm: The Political Party as Public Forum 13.3 The Mechanics of Public Fora 13.4 The Public Forum Doctrine Fit: Some Illustrations 14 Conclusion
Index
이용현황보기
Throwing the party : how the Supreme Court puts political party organizations ahead of voters 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호
청구기호
권별정보
자료실
이용여부
0002956131
LM 342.7307 -A23-1
서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대)
이용가능
출판사 책소개
The Supreme Court's understanding of political parties is impoverished, Batchis argues. The result is a distortion of the two-party system, and an inconsistent and contradictory constitutional law. From primaries to campaign finance, gerrymandering to ballot access, Batchis analyzes and offers a proposed solution to this problematic jurisprudence.