본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 6

Preface 4

Acknowledgements 5

Chapter 1. Introduction 9

1.1. Background 9

1.2. Objectives of the Guidelines 10

1.3. Overview of the Guidelines 11

1.4. Topics for further work and research 12

Chapter 2. Common principles of well-being measurement frameworks 14

2.1. Advancements in measuring societal progress 14

2.2. Common principles in measuring well-being 16

Chapter 3. Dimensions and Indicators 30

3.1. Scope 30

3.2. Common dimensions 31

3.2.1. Dimensions in existing frameworks 31

3.2.2. Recommended common dimensions 33

3.2.3. Country specific vs. internationally defined dimensions and indicators 33

3.3. Recommended indicators 34

3.3.1. Criteria for selecting indicators 34

3.3.2. Properties of the indicator set 35

3.3.3. Objective and subjective indicators 36

3.3.4. Recommended indicators 36

3.4. Distribution of well-being 42

Chapter 4. Composite Indicators 46

4.1. Definitions 46

4.2. Approaches for composite indicators 47

4.3. The use of weights in composite indicators 48

4.4. Country examples 49

4.5. Global examples 51

Chapter 5. Communication 52

5.1. Overview of communication approaches 52

5.1.1. Communication stages in the development of a well-being framework 52

5.1.2. Communication for stakeholders, users and audience 53

5.1.3. Communication of Indicators 56

5.2. Recommendations for visualisation 57

5.3. Recommendations for dashboard development 57

5.4. Examples of national communication platforms and tools 58

5.4.1. Ireland 58

5.4.2. Netherlands 60

5.4.3. Canada 62

5.4.4. Japan 66

Chapter 6. Developing a national well-being measurement framework 67

6.1. Considerations for establishing a well-being framework 67

6.2. Steps in establishing a national framework 68

6.2.1. Scope setting and research 69

6.2.2. Finalise definitions, develop measures and delivery 73

6.2.3. Delivery, launch and future 75

6.3. Recommendations for a national process 76

6.3.1. Who to involve in the process 77

6.3.2. Long-term maintenance 78

6.4. Country example of well-being framework development - New Zealand 79

6.4.1. Background of well-being in New Zealand 79

6.4.2. Engagement throughout development 80

6.4.3. Well-being in decision making 81

6.4.4. Summary 81

References 82

Annex: Indicator documentation 87

Tables 8

Table 3.1. Subjective well-being 37

Table 3.2. Material living conditions 38

Table 3.3. Work and leisure 38

Table 3.4. Housing 39

Table 3.5. Health 39

Table 3.6. Knowledge and skills 40

Table 3.7. Physical safety 40

Table 3.8. Social connections 41

Table 3.9. Civic engagement 41

Table 3.10. Environmental conditions 42

Table 5.1. Types of users by statistical products 54

Table 5.2. Types of users and communication channels 55

Figures 8

Figure 2.1. International initiatives that advanced the measurement of societal progress 14

Figure 2.2. The Sustainable Development Goals 17

Figure 2.3. Growth of national well-being frameworks in UNECE countries since 2000 18

Figure 2.4. The OECD Well-being Framework 21

Figure 2.5. The three domains of the Dutch Monitor of Well-being 22

Figure 2.6. Objectives of Canada's Framework 23

Figure 2.7. Well-being initiatives share common dimensions 24

Figure 2.8. The Irish Well-being Framework 26

Figure 2.9. Subjective well-being indicators in national frameworks 28

Figure 2.10. Objective and subjective indicators in the quality of employment dimension 29

Figure 3.1. Satisfaction with life by sex, age, education level, and origin/country of birth in the Netherlands in 2023. The percentage of the population... 43

Figure 5.1. Well-being Information Hub - Ireland 59

Figure 5.2. Well-being Information Hub, indicator presentation - Ireland 60

Figure 5.3. Dashboard visualizations of well-being indicators in the Netherlands 61

Figure 5.4. Dashboard visualizations of well-being indicators in the Netherlands 62

Figure 5.5. Canada - Quality of Life Framework 63

Figure 5.6. Canada - Quality of Life Framework dashboards 65

Figure 5.7. Japan - Overall life satisfaction and domain satisfaction indicators 66

Figure 6.1. Steps in developing a national well-being framework 68

Boxes 7

Box 2.1. The Sustainable Development Goals 17

Box 2.2. Examples of well-being policy practice 19

Box 2.3. Case study - The OECD Well-being Framework 21

Box 2.4. Case study - the Dutch Monitor of Well-being and the SDGs 22

Box 2.5. Case study - Canada's Quality of Life Framework 23

Box 2.6. Case study - Ireland's Well-being Framework 25

Box 2.7. Case study - Italy's Equitable and Sustainable Well-being (BES) Indicators 26

Box 2.8. Improvements in data infrastructure - the System of National Accounts 27

Box 2.9. Case study - Israel's Well-being, Sustainability and National Resilience Indicators 29

Box 3.1. Common dimensions in international well-being frameworks 32

Box 3.2. Recommended common dimensions 33

Box 3.3. Objective and subjective indicators and measurement methods 36

Box 3.4. Subjective and objective measures for poverty 44

Box 3.5. Children in well-being measurement frameworks 45

Box 4.1. Be transparent about methods, assumptions and limitations 47

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차