권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page
Contents
Abstract/Résumé 4
Trends in youth employment and comparison to other OECD countries 7
Government policies to improve life for youth 11
A race for educational credentials creates labour market mismatch 14
Labour market dualism is deeply entrenched 26
Product market dualism: the gap between SMEs and large firms 33
Recommendations to increase youth employment 39
References 40
Figure 1. Korea's youth employment rate is below the OECD average 7
Figure 2. Employment trends in Korea during the past two decades 8
Figure 3. Youth employment rates in Korea were below the OECD average in 2021 9
Figure 4. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on youth employment 10
Figure 5. Employment rates by education level 14
Figure 6. Technological change is reducing the number of production jobs 15
Figure 7. The share of women (aged 25-29) with a university degree is higher than for men 15
Figure 8. Nearly three-quarters of high school graduates advance to tertiary education 16
Figure 9. The share of tertiary graduates among young Koreans is the highest in the OECD 17
Figure 10. Reduced hopes of upward social mobility 18
Figure 11. Career status after graduation from vocational high school 18
Figure 12. The share of NEETs in Korea is high 19
Figure 13. The share of NEETs among women in the 25-29 age group has fallen 20
Figure 14. Field-of-study mismatch in Korea is relatively high 20
Figure 15. Financial returns to tertiary education are relatively low 21
Figure 16. Life satisfaction of Korean adolescents is low 23
Figure 17. An international ranking of the skillset of graduates 24
Figure 18. The share of non-regular workers is high for young people 27
Figure 19. Tertiary education increases the chance of regular employment and higher wages 28
Figure 20. Wages and social insurance coverage are lower for non-regular workers 29
Figure 21. Spending on active labour market policies in Korea is relatively low (in 2019) 31
Figure 22. Korea's minimum wage and participation tax rates are very high 32
Figure 23. The productivity gap between SMEs and large firms in Korea is wide 34
Figure 24. Large firms pay a significant wage premium in Korea 34
Figure 25. Education increases the chance of working at large firms 35
Figure 26. Korea's attitudes toward entrepreneurship show scope for improvement 37
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.