권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
Title page
Contents
Abstract 3
1. Introduction 4
2. Measuring Advances in AI and Robotics 8
2.1. Patent Data 8
2.2. Develop New AI and Robot Measures 8
2.3. Validation of Measures 10
3. AI and Job Tasks: Data and Empirical Strategy 11
3.1. Data on Tasks Performed on the Job 11
3.2. Empirical Strategy 13
3.3. Balancing Test: Do Tasks Predict Future Exposure? 14
4. The Impact of AI on Tasks Performed on the Job 16
4.1. Industry-level Correlations 16
4.2. AI and Worker-Level Tasks 18
4.3. High-level Versus Low-level Routine Tasks 22
4.4. AI and Job Tasks by Worker Skill 23
5. AI and Labor Market Outcomes 27
5.1. Administrative Labor Market Data 27
5.2. Estimation Approach 28
5.3. Displacement Effects of AI and Robots 28
5.4. AI and Worker Reallocation 30
5.5. Impact of AI and Robots on Earnings 31
6. Conclusion 32
References 35
A. Appendix 38
Table 1. Balancing test 15
Table 2. AI and Job Reallocation 31
Figure 1. AI, Robots, and Task Changes at the Industry Level 17
Figure 2. AI, Robots and Job Tasks at the Worker Level 19
Figure 3. AI and Detailed Job Tasks 21
Figure 4. AI and Low- versus High-Level Routine Tasks 23
Figure 5. AI and Detailed Job Tasks by Worker Skill 25
Figure 6. AI and Routine Tasks for Low- and High-skilled Workers 26
Figure 7. Employment effects of AI and Robots 29
Figure 8. Impact of AI on Earnings 33
Table A.1. Industries with the Highest Number of AI and Robot Patents 45
Table A.2. Descriptives of Task Data 46
Table A.3. Top occupations performing individual tasks (part 1) 47
Table A.4. Top occupations performing individual tasks (part 2) 48
Table A.5. Technology and Worker-level Task Shares 49
Table A.6. Comparing the Effects across Time 50
Table A.7. Top occupations performing high-level and low-level routine tasks 51
Table A.8. Descriptive Statistics of Social Security Data (SIAB) 52
Table A.9. Robustness: AI and Job Reallocation 53
Figure A.1. Evolution of AI and Robot Patents over Time 38
Figure A.2. Link between patents and other measures 39
Figure A.3. Robustness: AI and Robots and Job Tasks 40
Figure A.4. Robustness: AI and Low- versus High-Level Routine Tasks 41
Figure A.5. Robustness: Employment effects of AI and Robots 42
Figure A.6. Robustness: Impact of AI on Earnings 43
Figure A.7. Robots and Detailed Job Tasks 44
How does Artificial Intelligence (AI) affect the task content of work, and how do workers adjust to the diffusion of AI in the economy? To answer these important questions, we combine novel patent-based measures of AI and robot exposure with individual survey data on tasks performed on the job and administrative data on worker careers.
Like prior studies, we find that robots have reduced routine tasks. In sharp contrast, AI has reduced non-routine abstract tasks like information gathering and increased the demand for ‘high-level’ routine tasks like monitoring processes. These task shifts mainly occur within detailed occupations and become stronger over time.
While displacement effects are small, workers have responded by switching jobs, often to less exposed industries. We also document that low-skilled workers suffer some wage losses, while high-skilled incumbent workers experience wage gains.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.