본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 4

1. Executive summary 5

2. What is behind this analysis? 6

2.1. Identification of climate actions for assessment 8

2.2. Rapid Evidence Assessment 9

2.3. Rating of climate actions 10

3. How to use this analysis 11

3.1. How to use the ratings of all climate actions 11

3.2. How to use the case studies 13

4. Analysis and key findings 13

4.1. CA11; Active habitat management to increase resilience - a low/no regret natural resources-based action 18

4.2. CA16: Soil conservation - a low/no regret natural resources-based action 19

4.3. CA5: Aim to reduce direct emissions from public sector buildings by 75% by 2037 compared to 2017 - a low/no-regret action for the built environment 20

4.4. CA3: Passive cooling measures - a low-regret action for the built environment, with caveats 21

4.5. CA15: Suitable trees, crops, and livestock for future climate in appropriate locations - a low-regret natural resources-based action with caveats 21

4.6. CA10: At least 5 MtCO₂/yr of engineered removals by 2030 - an action with clear trade-offs 22

4.7. Caveats 23

4.8. Further research needs 25

Appendix A. Methodology 26

Appendix B. Final list of climate actions for assessment and descriptions 50

Appendix C. Evidence extraction to support rating of climate actions 54

Appendix D. Rating of climate actions based on evidence extraction only 54

Appendix E. Rating of climate actions based on evidence extraction and expert judgment to fill gaps 54

Appendix F. Literature search approach and search strings per action 55

Appendix G. Case study - soil conservation 60

Appendix H. Case study - Aim to reduce direct emissions from public sector buildings by 75% by 2037 compared to 2017 75

Tables 15

Table 1. Main low/no-regret climate actions 15

Table 2. Climate actions with (limited) trade-offs 16

Table 3. Climate actions with clear trade-offs 17

Table 4. Elements of adaptive capacity 30

Table 5. Action specific search terms for systematic literature review 55

Appendix Figures 28

Figure 1. Scope of assessment (Solid dark blue in scope. White/pink out of scope.) 28

Figure 2. Impact chain flow diagram 30

Figure 3. Flow chart of the search process 39

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차