본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

Title page 1

Contents 2

Executive Summary 7

Education hackathons 7

Hackathon Outcomes 8

PoC Development 8

User Research 9

Introduction 11

Project Aims 11

Project structure and phases 11

Summary of PoC build 14

Outline of the 3 strands of user research 17

Hackathon Findings 19

Summary 19

Summary of key use cases 23

User Research Findings 30

Introduction 30

Methods 31

Results 32

Conclusions 45

User research conclusions 45

Suggested areas of future focus 46

Further work in progress 49

Recommendations for delivery of future hackathons 50

Annex 1: Summary of pre-Hackathon consultation findings 53

Overview 53

Aims 53

Methods 54

Findings 56

Enablers and barriers to AI use 64

Next steps 65

Annex 2: Full Hackathon findings report (November 2023) 66

Introduction 66

Potential barriers to Generative AI adoption 67

Use cases for Teachers 69

Use cases for School Leaders and Administrators 78

Use case for Students 81

Annex 3: AI mini-hackathons project summary 84

Background to the project 84

The aims of the hackathon 84

What did we do? 85

What did we learn? 85

Annex 4: Membership of steering committee 89

Annex 5: Methods for user research 90

Methods 90

Sample and sampling strategy 90

Materials and Procedure 91

Annex 6/Annex 5: Prompts used in the Hackathons 93

Generating age-appropriate lesson plans 93

Generating effective questioning materials 95

Marking a KS2 essay based on a modified mark scheme and providing personalised feedback 97

Providing feedback on students' work in a way meaningful to students 98

Prompt used to generate newsletter articles, using standardised data fields (parent-carer communications) 100

Prompt used to simplify text for students (lesson materials) 101

Hallucination in creating end-of-year reports, with the hallucination highlighted in bold italics 103

Writing end-of-year reports for other teachers based on key information 104

Prompting the LLM to create a vocabulary list with simple prompting (language learning assistant) 106

Prompting the LLM to correct a student's work by providing steps to follow and one-shot prompting 106

Adjusting data literacy policies in line with school values 107

Providing detailed context for adapting school policy 110

Creating policy-based scenarios for testing with staff 111

Generating newsletters based on short user inputs 113

Mandarin language assistant 115

Annex 7/Annex 6: Key Terms 118

Annex 8/Annex 7: References 119

Tables 6

Table 1. 8 use cases selected as having potential to develop to PoC 13

Table 2. Participants in each strand of user research 18

Table 3. Use cases explored during the hackathons 20

Table 4. Summary of user feedback for generating age-appropriate lesson plans 23

Table 5. Summary of user feedback for generating effective questioning ideas 24

Table 6. Summary of user feedback for generating lesson materials 24

Table 7. Summary of user feedback for assigning marks to work submitted by students 25

Table 8. Summary of user feedback for generating personalised formative feedback and addressing student misconceptions 27

Table 9. Summary of user feedback for generating drafts of statutory policies 28

Table 10. Summary of user feedback for generating pupil or class data analysis and synthesis 28

Table 11. Summary of top five time saving use cases across teachers, leaders and administrators 62

Table 12. Summary of top five professional development use cases across teachers, leaders and administrators 63

Table 13/Table 14. Teacher sample and school contexts 90

Figures 5

Figure 1. Screenshot of the essay upload user interface 15

Figure 2. Screenshot of the teacher feedback user view 15

Figure 3. Screenshot of the student feedback user view 16

Figure 4. Screenshot of the student task user view 17

Figure 5. Opportunities and risks associated with using GenAI tools for assessment and feedback 33

Figure 6. Needs identified by teachers based on their perceived barriers and facilitators to GenAI adoption in schools 40

Figure 7. Breakdown of survey stakeholders by role 54

Figure 8. Venn diagram to show the overlap in teachers' use case choices for time saving and strengthening practice 57