권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title page 1
Contents 6
Abstract 3
Acknowledgments 4
Executive summary 8
1. Quantifying Industrial Strategies: the 2025 vintage 10
Background and methodology 10
Overall trends 12
2. The size of industrial policy support across countries 15
The evolution of grants and tax expenditures 15
The evolution of financial instruments 17
3. The main targets of industrial policy support 19
The level and evolution of expenditures vary across policy targets 19
Industrial policy instruments often combine multiple targets 21
Green industrial policy spending grew in recent years, with grants playing the main role and most support being non-sectoral 22
Support to investment in fixed capital is a major component of industrial strategies and is typically horizontal 24
Energy cost support reached its highest level since the COVID-19 pandemic, with European countries driving much of the increase 25
Government support for SMEs and young firms expanded through grants and tax expenditures, but fell via financial instruments 27
4. Sectoral industrial policy expenditures 31
Energy, manufacturing, and transport received most sectoral support 31
Sectoral support varies widely across countries 32
How targeted is sectoral support? 34
Countries do not systematically allocate targeted grants and tax expenditures to their most productive or export-competitive sectors 36
References 38
Annex A. Supplementary tables 41
Annex B. Supplementary figures 43
Figure 1.1. The QuIS database records multiple dimensions and targets 11
Figure 1.2. The number of policy instruments varies widely across countries 12
Figure 1.3. There is little entry and exit of industrial policy instruments 13
Figure 1.4. Spending via grants and tax expenditures increased between 2019 and 2023 14
Figure 2.1. Several countries saw large increases in industrial policy spending through grants and tax expenditures between 2019 and 2023 16
Figure 2.2. The use of financial instruments remained stable in most countries 17
Figure 3.1. Sectoral development and support to fixed capital investment are the main industrial policy targets 20
Figure 3.2. There is an important overlap between industrial policy targets 21
Figure 3.3. Industrial policy support on green measures increased despite lower support for the energy sector, driven by horizontal measures 23
Figure 3.4. Fixed capital support is mostly provided through horizontal schemes 25
Figure 3.5. Energy cost support increased, driven by horizontal schemes and programmes targeted at the manufacturing sector 26
Figure 3.6. Support for SMEs and young firms via grants and tax expenditure frequently targets fixed capital, labour costs, and R&D 28
Figure 3.7. Guarantees and loans are the key in supporting SMEs and young firms 29
Figure 4.1. Sectoral industrial policies tend to focus on Energy, Manufacturing, and Transport 32
Figure 4.2. Countries support different sectors 33
Figure 4.3. OECD Member countries differ substantially in the targeted nature of their sectoral industrial strategies 34
Figure 4.4. Some subsectors are intensively supported by targeted industrial policies 35
Figure 4.5. Sectoral support is negatively associated with export competitiveness 37
Figure A B.1. Larger economies tend to implement more industrial policy instruments 43
Figure A B.2. Growth came mainly from new measures, while reductions from discontinued measures remained limited 43
Figure A B.3. The average volume of export finance fell to its lowest level in 2023 44
Figure A B.4. Export finance support is mainly delivered through guarantees 44
Figure A B.5. Most QuIS countries expanded support between 2022 and 2023 45
Figure A B.6. The use of financial instruments declined in several countries compared to 2022 45
Figure A B.7. There is no relationship between public spending on green industrial policies and energy-related CO₂ efficiency 46
Figure A B.8. Support for fixed capital through financial instruments decreased on average 46
Figure A B.9. Countries with high energy tax rates tend to provide higher energy cost support 47
Figure A B.10. Government financial support to SMEs and young firms is positively associated with tighter financing conditions 47
Figure A B.11. Many countries have low levels of government venture capital despite limited private venture capital activity 48
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.